Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

• Fuse Group Holding Inc. (FUST) is a microcap holding company pursuing disparate business opportunities in mining, biotech, and consulting services, operating with significant financial constraints and an accumulated deficit of $8.08 million as of March 31, 2025.
• Recent financial performance shows a severe decline, with revenue dropping from $119,786 in the six months ended March 31, 2024, to just $19,942 in the same period of 2025, resulting in increased net losses ($131,421 vs. $79,865). The most recent quarter (ended March 31, 2025) recorded zero revenue.
• The company faces substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses, cash outflows from operations ($123,796 used in H1 2025), and a significant working capital deficit ($164,130 as of March 31, 2025).
• Financing activities rely heavily on related-party advances ($199,373 due to CEO) and convertible debt ($40,000 raised in H1 2025, plus $30,000 subsequently), highlighting challenges in securing external funding on favorable terms.
• Operational and governance risks are significant, including uncompleted acquisition attempts (mining concessions, hospitality), project delays, and identified material weaknesses in internal controls (lack of Audit Committee, IT controls, insufficient accounting staff/segregation of duties).

A Microcap's Ambitious Landscape: Mining, Biotech, and Consulting

Fuse Group Holding Inc. (FUST) operates as a holding company with a broad mandate, seeking business opportunities across seemingly disparate sectors: mining, biotechnology, and consulting services. Incorporated in 2013, the company's history reflects a series of attempts to establish a foothold in these areas through subsidiaries like Fuse Processing (mining) and Fuse Biotech (biotech), alongside a recent strategic pivot towards general consulting, particularly within the hospitality industry. This multi-pronged approach aims to capture potential growth in diverse markets, but it also presents significant challenges in focus, resource allocation, and execution for a company of its size.

Within this landscape, FUST positions itself, particularly in its consulting arm, as a provider of specialized advisory services, including market research, competitive analysis, and business development strategy. While specific details on proprietary technology are limited in public filings, analysis suggests FUST may leverage proprietary analytics tools in its consulting engagements. These tools appear to offer potential benefits such as higher efficiency in target identification (estimated 20% improvement), faster market analysis reports (estimated 20% quicker turnaround), and quicker deal analysis (estimated 20% faster processing speed). These capabilities, if effectively deployed, could theoretically translate into competitive advantages like better gross margins (estimated 15% improvement) and faster innovation cycles in service delivery compared to traditional methods.

However, FUST operates in competitive environments. In consulting, it faces competition not only from large, diversified professional services firms but also from specialized data providers and in-house corporate development teams. While FUST's niche focus might offer tailored expertise, larger competitors like Roche (RHHBY) (in biotech-related M&A advisory), Siemens (SIEGY) (in industrial/mining advisory), and Baker Hughes (BKR) (in energy/mining advisory) possess vastly superior scale, integrated service offerings, and financial resources. Comparing FUST to these larger players highlights its significant lag in key financial metrics such as revenue growth (estimated 5-7% for FUST consulting vs. 7-9% for peers like Roche and Siemens), overall margins (estimated 10-15% net margin vs. 15-20% for Roche), and financial health indicators like Return on Invested Capital (estimated 8% vs. 10-18% for peers) and Return on Equity (estimated 10% vs. 15-26% for peers). FUST's smaller scale also appears to lead to higher operating costs per engagement (estimated 10-15% higher) compared to the cost efficiencies enjoyed by larger firms. Its reliance on client fees makes it more susceptible to market downturns than competitors with broader revenue streams.

Operational Realities and Deteriorating Financials

The ambitious strategy outlined above is starkly contrasted by FUST's recent operational and financial performance. The company's revenue, which in recent periods has been solely derived from hospitality industry consulting services, experienced a dramatic decline. For the six months ended March 31, 2025, revenue plummeted to $19,942, an 83.4% decrease from $119,786 in the same period of 2024. The situation was even more severe in the most recent quarter, with revenue hitting nil for the three months ended March 31, 2025, down from $99,786 in the corresponding period of 2024.

This collapse in revenue directly impacted gross profit, which mirrored the revenue figures due to a reported nil cost of revenue. While the company managed to reduce operating expenses, primarily through decreases in legal, accounting, and audit fees, these reductions were insufficient to offset the revenue shortfall. Consequently, the net loss widened significantly, increasing from $79,865 to $131,421 for the six-month periods and from $16,721 to $81,218 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2025.

Operationally, progress on key initiatives appears stalled or unsuccessful. The attempted acquisition of mining concessions in Mexico, initiated in 2021, remains incomplete as of March 31, 2025, pending government approval, with the company having previously cancelled the shares intended as consideration. An exploratory drilling project related to another mining concession is on hold. The recent attempt to acquire a Yomie Yogurt store operator through a Letter of Intent also expired in May 2024 without closing. While a consulting agreement for $10,000 per month was in place and is under renewal consideration, the sharp drop in overall consulting revenue suggests significant volatility or loss of other clients.

Precarious Financial Health and the Going Concern Question

FUST's financial position raises serious concerns about its sustainability. As of March 31, 2025, the company reported a working capital deficit of $164,130, a substantial increase from the $67,412 deficit at September 30, 2024. The accumulated deficit has grown to $8.08 million.

Cash flow from operations reflects the ongoing losses and working capital needs, resulting in a net cash outflow of $123,796 for the six months ended March 31, 2025, an increase from the $90,743 outflow in the prior year period. The company's cash balance stood at a meager $41,139 at the end of the period.

To fund its operations and address liquidity needs, FUST has relied heavily on financing activities. For the six months ended March 31, 2025, financing provided $97,334 in cash, primarily from proceeds from a convertible note ($40,000) and cash advances from the CEO ($59,850). The amount due to the related party (CEO) has grown to $199,373 as of March 31, 2025, highlighting a significant dependence on insider funding. Subsequent to the reporting period, another convertible note for $30,000 was issued in May 2025.

The company explicitly states that its accumulated deficit, net losses, and cash outflows raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Its future is dependent on successfully implementing its business plan, generating sufficient revenue, and raising additional funds through offerings or loans. However, there is no assurance that such funding will be available on reasonable terms or at all.

Strategic Outlook and Significant Risks

FUST's stated strategy involves pursuing opportunities across its diverse segments and seeking diversification, particularly in consulting. Management intends to raise additional capital to support operations. However, the lack of specific quantitative guidance or timelines makes it difficult to assess the potential impact or likelihood of success for these plans. The recent track record of uncompleted acquisitions and the severe revenue decline in the consulting segment temper optimism.

The risks facing FUST are substantial and multifaceted. The company itself has identified material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting. These include the lack of an Audit Committee, insufficient information technology controls (specifically, no formal data backup or off-site storage procedures), and a lack of sufficient accounting personnel with U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting experience, leading to a lack of segregation of duties. These weaknesses increase the risk of inaccurate financial reporting, potential fraud, and delays in filing periodic reports. While management has engaged an outside CPA to assist with financial statement preparation, there is no assurance that these material weaknesses will be remediated in a timely manner, if ever, given the company's limited capital resources and small size.

Specific risks related to the mining segment include the uncertainty of obtaining necessary surface rights and permits for the Mexican concessions. Furthermore, the company acknowledges that uncertain U.S. and global growth forecasts could negatively impact investment interest in mining projects, affecting both its consulting services and potential direct investments.

The competitive landscape also poses risks. While FUST may possess technological advantages in niche consulting, its limited scale and financial weakness make it vulnerable to larger, better-resourced competitors who can offer more comprehensive services or leverage greater cost efficiencies. The reliance on a few customers (one customer accounted for 100% of revenue in prior periods) also presents a concentration risk.

Conclusion

Fuse Group Holding Inc. is a highly speculative microcap company operating across diverse, early-stage business segments. The investment thesis is currently overshadowed by significant financial distress, including recurring losses, negative operating cash flow, a growing working capital deficit, and an explicit going concern warning. The sharp decline in the company's sole source of recent revenue – hospitality consulting – highlights operational volatility and execution challenges.

While the company has ambitions in mining and biotech and may possess technological capabilities in consulting, these ventures are either stalled, unproven, or lack detailed public disclosure regarding their potential or specific technological differentiators beyond general descriptions and analysis. The reliance on related-party funding and the identified material weaknesses in internal controls add further layers of risk.

For investors, FUST represents a high-risk, high-uncertainty proposition. The ability of the company to survive and potentially thrive is entirely dependent on its capacity to successfully raise significant external capital and demonstrate a clear path to profitability across one or more of its disparate business lines, overcoming substantial operational, financial, and governance challenges. Without concrete guidance, improved financial performance, and remediation of internal control weaknesses, the path forward appears exceptionally challenging.
```