MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO)

Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

• The 100% Algorithm Pivot: MicroAlgo's complete exit from chip resale in 2024 transformed a $37.9 million loss-making business into a $5.4 million profitable operation, with algorithm services generating the entirety of revenue. This matters because it proves the company can execute a strategic retreat and rebuild on a software-centric model with fundamentally better economics.

• Balance Sheet as Competitive Weapon: With $144.1 million in cash—six times total debt—and a negative enterprise value of -$34.43 million, MicroAlgo possesses financial firepower that loss-making quantum peers can only dream of. This provides the flexibility to survive dilution pressures and fund quantum R&D without dilutive equity raises.

• Quantum Computing Optionality at a Discount: While pure-play quantum competitors trade at 200-1,000x sales with negative margins, MicroAlgo's quantum algorithm development (Grover-based, QIRO, QPE) is embedded in a profitable business trading at 1.15x sales. The risk/reward hinges on whether this software-based quantum approach can commercialize before cash burn resumes.

• The Dilution Dilemma: A 30-for-1 reverse split in July 2025, following a 20-for-1 split in 2024, plus convertible notes at 70% of market price, signals ongoing shareholder dilution despite profitability. This structural headwind explains why the stock trades at a discount despite operational improvement.

• Scale vs. Survival Trade-off: Revenue declined 35% in H1 2025 while net income rose 63%, showing management prioritizes profitability over growth. This is rational for a sub-$100 million revenue company but creates a strategic vulnerability: competitors like IonQ and D-Wave are growing 100%+ annually, potentially capturing market share while MicroAlgo focuses on financial stability.

Setting the Scene: The Algorithm-Only Gambit

MicroAlgo Inc., operational since at least 2020 and headquartered in Shenzhen, China, began as a hybrid algorithm and chip reseller serving internet advertising, gaming, and intelligent chip markets across China and Hong Kong. For investors, the company's history only matters insofar as it explains today's positioning—and that history is a tale of strategic amputation. In 2020 and 2021, MicroAlgo pursued acquisitions totaling $17.7 million, building goodwill and intangible assets while generating modest profits. The subsequent two years revealed the model's fragility: losses of $7.0 million in 2022 and $37.9 million in 2023, accompanied by revenue erosion from $87.1 million to $81.9 million.

The pivotal moment arrived in 2024. Management made a binary choice: exit the intelligent chips and services segment entirely, focusing solely on central processing algorithm services. This wasn't a gradual shift—it was a complete discontinuation. The result? Revenue of $75.3 million, down from the prior year, but net income of $5.4 million, marking the first profitable year after two consecutive losses. This strategic retreat matters because it demonstrates management's willingness to sacrifice scale for unit economics, a rare discipline in China's tech landscape where growth is often prioritized above all else.

MicroAlgo's current business model is straightforward: it develops and applies central processing algorithm solutions that optimize computing power without hardware upgrades, process data, and deliver intelligence services. The company operates through a single segment after its 2024 pivot, offering algorithm optimization, advertising display, mobile game publishing, and software development. Its expansion into Hong Kong has yielded 328% year-over-year revenue growth in that market, diversifying away from mainland China concentration—a critical move given geopolitical tensions and regulatory uncertainties.

The competitive landscape shapes MicroAlgo's opportunity and risk. The company sits at the intersection of two megatrends: AI-driven algorithm optimization and quantum computing. Unlike pure-play quantum competitors IonQ , Rigetti , and D-Wave that focus on hardware development, MicroAlgo pursues a software-based approach. This creates a fundamental trade-off: lower capital intensity and faster time-to-market, but potentially weaker competitive moats and performance limitations compared to hardware-based quantum systems. The global AI market is projected to reach $1.8 trillion by 2030, while quantum computing applications in finance, healthcare, and logistics are emerging. MicroAlgo's positioning as a software-first player means it can capture value from these trends without the $100+ million annual cash burn that plagues its quantum peers.

Technology, Products, and Strategic Differentiation

MicroAlgo's technological differentiation centers on quantum-inspired algorithms that can run on classical hardware, a stark contrast to the superconducting qubits and trapped-ion systems pursued by IonQ and Rigetti . The company is actively developing Grover-based quantum algorithms for finding pure Nash equilibria in graphical games, Quantum Image LSQb algorithms for secure information transmission, and Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) methods to enhance neural network training. These projects remain in R&D, but their strategic importance is profound: they represent a bet that quantum advantage can be achieved through algorithmic innovation rather than hardware breakthroughs.

The significance for the investment thesis lies in this: if MicroAlgo's software-based quantum algorithms can deliver even a fraction of the performance gains promised by hardware quantum computers—at a fraction of the cost—the company could disrupt the economics of AI optimization. The company's core value proposition is accelerating computing power without hardware upgrades, which directly addresses enterprise customers' capital constraints. In internet advertising, where real-time bidding requires microsecond optimization, and in gaming, where complex simulations demand massive parallel processing, even modest algorithmic improvements translate to tangible ROI.

The R&D strategy reflects this software-first philosophy. Research and development investments decreased by $49.5 million, or 30.7%, in the first half of 2025, following the completion of certain outsourced projects. This cost reduction, combined with the 63% increase in net income despite a 35% revenue decline, suggests MicroAlgo has shifted from outsourced, project-based R&D to more focused, internal development. The risk is that this frugal approach may fall behind the aggressive R&D spending of IonQ (which burns over $100 million annually) and D-Wave in the race for quantum supremacy.

Management's strategic focus on central processing algorithm services has proven effective in the near term, delivering 100% of 2024 revenue from this segment. However, this concentration is also a vulnerability. The complete discontinuation of the intelligent chips segment means MicroAlgo has no diversification if algorithm services face pricing pressure or technological disruption. The company's moat, if it exists, lies in proprietary algorithms and China-specific data intelligence capabilities. As a subsidiary of WiMi Hologram Cloud , MicroAlgo benefits from local partnerships and regulatory access that foreign competitors cannot easily replicate—a meaningful advantage in China's protected tech market.

Financial Performance & Segment Dynamics: Profitability Over Growth

MicroAlgo's financial results in 2024 and early 2025 tell a clear story: management is optimizing for survival and profitability, not hypergrowth. The 2024 net income of $5.4 million on $75.3 million revenue produced a 7.2% profit margin—a remarkable achievement for a company that lost $37.9 million the prior year. This turnaround was driven entirely by the algorithm services pivot, which generated 100% of revenue and carried lower cost structures than the discontinued chip resale business.

The first half of 2025 results reveal the strategic tension. Revenue fell 35% to CNY 188.1 million from CNY 290.4 million year-over-year, yet net income rose 63% to CNY 26.5 million from CNY 16.3 million. Cost of revenues decreased only 2.1% to RMB 387.7 million, but selling, general, and administrative expenses saw significant reductions. This cost discipline matters because it shows MicroAlgo can maintain profitability even with top-line pressure—a crucial capability for a small player in a capital-intensive industry. However, it also raises questions about long-term competitiveness: can a company growing slower than its peers maintain technological relevance?

The balance sheet provides the strongest evidence for the bull case. Cash reserves increased to $144.1 million in 2024, up from RMB 317 million in 2023, and current assets significantly exceed current liabilities. The company's cash is six times greater than total debt, including convertible notes payable. This fortress balance sheet is the inverse of quantum peers: IonQ has $1.4 billion in cash but burns over $100 million annually; Rigetti and D-Wave face similar cash depletion risks. MicroAlgo's positive free cash flow of $4.1 million (TTM) and operating cash flow of $4.1 million demonstrate self-sufficiency.

MicroAlgo's positive free cash flow of $4.1 million (TTM) and operating cash flow of $4.1 million demonstrate self-sufficiency.

The capital structure tells a more concerning story. A 30-for-1 reverse stock split approved in July 2025, following a 20-for-1 split in late 2024, indicates persistent share price weakness requiring mechanical uplift to maintain NASDAQ listing requirements. The $35 million convertible note offering in July 2025, with conversion at 70% of the lowest closing price over 60 trading days, introduces ongoing dilution risk. These financial engineering moves suggest that despite operational profitability, equity value continues to erode—a classic small-cap value trap signal.

Outlook, Management Guidance, and Execution Risk

Management's strategic direction is clear: expand algorithm services, leverage quantum R&D, and diversify geographically through Hong Kong. The Hong Kong expansion has already delivered 328% year-over-year revenue growth, reducing dependence on the Chinese market—a critical mitigation of regulatory risk. However, the company has not provided specific quantitative guidance for 2025 revenue or profit targets, leaving investors to extrapolate from H1 trends.

Analyst expectations for Q2 2025, scheduled for release on August 7, 2025, project EPS of $0.04 and revenue of $16.8 million, representing 12% year-over-year growth. These modest expectations reflect the market's skepticism about MicroAlgo's growth trajectory. More optimistically, some analysts project that a successful quantum image encryption platform launch in Q3 2025 could drive 20-30% annual revenue growth over three years. This represents the key catalyst: converting quantum R&D into commercial revenue.

The execution risk is substantial. MicroAlgo's software-based quantum approach competes against well-funded hardware players. IonQ's world-record fidelity achievements in November 2025 and D-Wave's 100% year-over-year revenue growth demonstrate the competitive intensity. MicroAlgo's 27.2% revenue decline (TTM) versus peers' median 14.7% growth highlights its market share vulnerability. The company's 14.9% free cash flow margin, while positive, lags the peer median of 25.8%, suggesting less efficient operations.

Management's commentary emphasizes the strategic focus on AI-driven algorithms to capitalize on the $1.8 trillion AI market by 2030. However, the absence of specific customer wins, contract values, or pipeline visibility makes this ambition difficult to underwrite. The WiMi Hologram Cloud stake increase, with shares locked for 10 years, signals parent confidence but also raises governance questions about related-party transactions and strategic control.

Risks and Asymmetries: What Could Break the Thesis

The central thesis—that MicroAlgo is a cash-rich, profitable quantum computing play trading at a discount—faces several material risks that could render the investment thesis worthless.

Dilution and Governance Risk: The pattern of reverse splits and convertible notes at deep discounts (70% of market price) indicates management's primary tool for capital raising is equity dilution. With 25% short interest as of June 2025, the stock is vulnerable to short squeezes, but also to death spiral financing if the convertible notes trigger mass conversions. The 10-year share lock-up by WiMi (WIMI) provides stability but also means public shareholders have limited influence over strategic decisions.

Scale and Competitive Displacement: MicroAlgo's $74.2 million TTM revenue is orders of magnitude smaller than IonQ's $39.9 million quarterly revenue and D-Wave's $22 million nine-month revenue. While profitability is an advantage today, the quantum computing market may reward scale and R&D spending over financial discipline. If hardware-based quantum computers achieve commercial viability before MicroAlgo's software algorithms, the company could be rendered obsolete in its target markets.

Technology Viability Risk: The company's quantum algorithm development is unproven at scale. While Grover-based algorithms and QPE methods show theoretical promise, MicroAlgo has not disclosed performance benchmarks, customer pilots, or commercial applications. The 30.7% R&D spending cut raises questions about whether the company can maintain pace with IonQ's $100+ million annual burn or D-Wave's aggressive development.

Geopolitical and Customer Concentration: Despite Hong Kong diversification, MicroAlgo remains exposed to Chinese regulatory risk. The company's customer concentration in internet advertising and gaming—sectors subject to volatile policy shifts—creates revenue unpredictability. Any disruption in these sectors or tightening of data processing regulations could impact the algorithm services segment that comprises 100% of revenue.

Valuation Asymmetry: The negative enterprise value suggests extreme pessimism. If MicroAlgo can demonstrate even modest quantum algorithm commercialization, re-rating to peer revenue multiples (200-1,000x) would imply exponential upside. Conversely, if the algorithm business continues to shrink and quantum R&D fails to produce results, the cash hoard becomes a melting ice cube as burn rate increases.

Valuation Context: Getting the Business for Free

At $7.10 per share, MicroAlgo trades at a market capitalization of $85.66 million. The valuation metrics present a stark dichotomy between traditional multiples and balance sheet reality.

The company trades at a GAAP P/E of 16.7x, significantly below the peer average of 55.5x and the US IT industry average of 31.3x. However, this comparison is misleading: peers IonQ , Rigetti , and D-Wave have no meaningful P/E ratios because they are deeply unprofitable. MicroAlgo's profitability is a distinguishing feature, not a discount signal.

More relevant is the price-to-sales ratio of 1.15x ($85.66M market cap / $74.19M TTM revenue), which compares to IonQ (IONQ) at 218.95x, Rigetti (RGTI) at 1,106.89x, and D-Wave (QBTS) at 392.27x. This suggests the market assigns minimal value to MicroAlgo's revenue stream, likely reflecting skepticism about growth and competitive positioning.

The most compelling valuation metric is enterprise value of -$34.43 million, calculated as market cap minus net cash. With $144.1 million in cash and minimal debt, the market is effectively paying investors to take the operating business. This negative enterprise value is extraordinarily rare for a profitable company and indicates either profound pessimism or a market inefficiency.

Balance sheet strength provides a floor but not a catalyst. The current ratio of 33.05 and debt-to-equity of 0.01 demonstrate fortress-like liquidity. Return on assets of 1.01% and return on equity of 4.35% show modest but positive capital efficiency, far superior to peers' negative returns. The challenge is converting this financial stability into growth that justifies a re-rating.

Conclusion: A Profitable Quantum Lottery Ticket

MicroAlgo represents an unusual asymmetry in the quantum computing landscape: a profitable, cash-rich algorithm company trading at a negative enterprise value while pure-play quantum competitors burn cash at premium valuations. The 2024 pivot to 100% algorithm services has proven that management can execute a strategic turnaround, delivering positive margins and free cash flow where peers cannot.

The investment thesis hinges on two variables: the commercialization timeline for MicroAlgo's quantum algorithm R&D, and management's ability to grow revenue without resuming cash burn. If the company can launch its quantum image encryption platform in Q3 2025 and demonstrate 20-30% revenue growth, the stock could re-rate toward peer multiples, implying multi-bagger returns. If quantum development stalls and the algorithm business continues to shrink, the cash hoard provides downside protection but not value creation.

The 25% short interest and persistent dilution from convertible notes create near-term volatility, but also potential for sharp upside if operational momentum surprises. For investors, MicroAlgo is essentially a profitable call option on software-based quantum computing, with the unusual feature that the premium is paid by the market rather than the buyer. The question is whether the underlying business can scale before the option expires.